On the Possibility of a Positive-Sum Game in the Distribution of Health Care Resources
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2003 June; 28(3): 327-338
Health care resource distribution is a subject of debate among health policy analysts, economists, and philosophers. In the United States, there is a widening gap between the more- and less- advantaged socioeconomic sub-populations in terms of both health care resource distribution and outcomes. Conventional wisdom suggests that there is a tradeoff, a zero-sum game, between efficiency and fairness in the distribution of health care resources. Promoting fairness in the distribution of health care resources and outcomes is not efficient in terms of maximization of a health outcome production function. On the other side of the coin, improving efficiency comes at the expense of fairness. Such conventional wisdom is supported in part by standard static Paretian welfare analysis. However, in this paper it is shown that in a dynamic setting in which there are efficiency gains in the health production function, fairness in distribution of health care resources can improve simultaneously.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Attfield, Robin (1990-09)The international disparities in health and health-care provision comprise the gravest problem of medical ethics. The implications are explored of three theories of justice: an expanded version of Rawlsian contractarianism, ...
Wright, Stephen G. (1996-06)Perceived advances in medicine lead to raised public expectations of care. Resources are finite, but governments can choose how they spend health service funds. Decisions on health 'priorities' have implications for ...