Exploitation in Biomedical Research
Resnik, David B.
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2003; 24(3): 233-259
This essay analyzes exploitation in biomedical research in terms of three basic elements: harm, disrespect, or injustice. There are also degrees of exploitation, ranging from highly exploitative to minimally exploitative. Although exploitation is prima facie wrongful, some exploitative research studies are morally justified, all things considered. The reason an exploitative study can still be ethical is that other moral considerations, such as the autonomy of the research subject or the social benefits of research, may sometimes justify studies that are minimally exploitative. Calling a research project exploitative does not end the debate about the merits of the study but invites one to ask additional questions about how the study is exploitative, and whether the study is justifiable nevertheless.
Autonomy; Biomedical Research; Harm; Research; Philosophical Ethics; Technology Assessment; Informed Consent or Human Experimentation; International and Political Dimensions of Biology and Medicine; Research on Special Populations; Research on Foreign Nationals; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome or HIV Infection;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Privatized biomedical research, public fears, and the hazards of government regulation: lessons from stem cell research Resnik, David B. (1999)This paper discusses the hazards of regulating controversial biomedical research in light of the emergence of powerful, multi- national biotechnology corporations. Prohibitions on the use of government funds can simply ...