Is It Time to Abandon Institutional Research Ethics Committees?
Monash Bioethics Review 2002 July; 21(3): S74-S77
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Two Deaths and Two Lessons: Is It Time to Review the Structure and Function of Research Ethics Committees? Savulescu, Julian (2002-02)
Protecting Research Participants Review of Institutional Review Boards: Management and Function, Edited by R.J. Amdur and E.A. Bankert; Institutional Review Board: Member Handbook, by R. Amdur; Study Guide for Institutional Review Board: Management and Function, by S. Kornetsky, A. Davis, and R.J. Amdur; Principles of Clinical Research, Edited by I. Di Giovanna and G. Hayes; Informed Consent in Medical Research, Edited by L. Doyal and J.S. Tobias; the Complete Guide to Informed Consent in Clinical Trials, Edited by T. Hartnett; Tuskegee's Truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, Edited by S.M. Reverby; European Neonatal Research: Consent, Ethics Committees and Law, Edited by S. Mason and C. Megone; the Ethics of Medical Research on Humans, by C. Foster; Ethical Issues in Biomedical Publication, Edited by A. Hudson Jones and F. McLellan; Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research (3rd Edition), Edited by S. Lock, F. Wells, and M. Farthing; Biomedical Research Ethics: Updating International Guidel Nicholson, Richard (2002-11)
Are Research Ethics Committees Behaving Unethically? Some Suggestions for Improving Performance and Accountability Savulescu, Julian; Chalmers, Iain; Blunt, Jennifer (1996-11-30)The results of recent empirical investigations in research synthesis imply that research ethics committees are behaving unethically by endorsing new research which is unnecessary and by acquiescing in biased under-reporting of ...