Deception in Research: Distinctions and Solutions From the Perspective of Utilitarianism
Pittenger, David J.
Ethics and Behavior 2002; 12(2): 117-142
The use of deception in psychological research continues to be a controversial topic. Using Rawls's explication of utilitarianism, I attempt to demonstrate how professional organizations, such as the American Psychological Association, can provide more specific standards that determine the permissibility of deception in research. Specifically, I argue that researchers should examine the costs and benefits of creating and applying specific rules governing deception. To that end, I offer 3 recommendations. First, that researchers who use deception provide detailed accounts of the procedures they used to minimize the harm created by deception in their research reports. Second, that the American Psychological Association offer a definition of deception that describes techniques commonly used in research. Finally, I recommend that the informed consent procedure be revised to indicate that the researcher may use deception as a part of the study.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Pittenger, David J. (2003)The Internet offers many new opportunities for behavioral researchers to conduct quantitative and qualitative research. Although the ethical guidelines of the American Psychological Association generalize, in part, to ...
Pittenger, David J. (2003)The primary purpose of this article is to explore the limits that an agent, such as the government or the American Psychological Association, may place on one's right to pursue a program of research or to share the findings ...
Retrieving Semen From a Dead Patient: Utilitarianism in the Absence of Definitive Guidelines; the Patient Was Assaulted; Some Ethical Concerns Were Ignored; an Ethic of Ambivalence Swinn, Michael; Emberton, Mark; Ralph, David; Smith, Martin; Serhal, Paul; Bewley, Susan; Lichterman, Boleslav; Steinberg, Deborah Lynn (1998-12-05)