The Mismeasure of Morals: Antisocial Personality Traits Predict Utilitarian Responses to Moral Dilemmas
Bartels, Daniel M
Pizarro, David A
Cognition 2011 Oct; 121(1): 154-61
Researchers have recently argued that utilitarianism is the appropriate framework by which to evaluate moral judgment, and that individuals who endorse non-utilitarian solutions to moral dilemmas (involving active vs. passive harm) are committing an error. We report a study in which participants responded to a battery of personality assessments and a set of dilemmas that pit utilitarian and non-utilitarian options against each other. Participants who indicated greater endorsement of utilitarian solutions had higher scores on measures of Psychopathy, machiavellianism, and life meaninglessness. These results question the widely-used methods by which lay moral judgments are evaluated, as these approaches lead to the counterintuitive conclusion that those individuals who are least prone to moral errors also possess a set of psychological characteristics that many would consider prototypically immoral.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
An investigation of the role and specificity of affective deficits in the development of callous unemotional traits and antisocial behaviors Cardinale, Elise (Georgetown University, 2017)With the development of new diagnostic criteria for Conduct Disorder (CD) in the DSM-5, the Limited Prosocial Emotions (LPE) specifier was added to identify a subgroup of children who exhibit what have traditionally been ...