Public Policy Versus Individual Rights in Childhood Obesity Interventions: Perspectives From the Arkansas Experience With Act 1220 of 2003
Creator
Phillips, Martha M
Ryan, Kevin
Raczynski, James M
Bibliographic Citation
Preventing chronic disease 2011 Sep; 8(5): A96
Abstract
Childhood obesity is a major public health problem. Experts recommend that prevention and control strategies include population-based policies. Arkansas Act 1220 of 2003 is one such initiative and provides examples of the tensions between individual rights and public policy. We discuss concerns raised during the implementation of Act 1220 related to the 2 primary areas in which they emerged: body mass index measurement and reporting to parents and issues related to vending machine access. We present data from the evaluation of Act 1220 that have been used to address concerns and other research findings and conclude with a short discussion of the tension between personal rights and public policy. States considering similar policy approaches should address these concerns during policy development, involve multiple stakeholder groups, establish the legal basis for public policies, and develop consensus on key elements.
Permanent Link
Find in a Libraryhttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/1015762
Date
2011-09Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Prevention Versus Protection: Reconciling Global Public Health and Human Rights Perspectives on Childhood Disability
Durkin, Maureen S; Gottlieb, Carissa (2009-01) -
Increased Access to Unrestricted Pharmacy Sales of Syringes in Seattle- King County, Washington: Structural and Individual-Level Changes, 1996 Versus 2003
Deibert, Ryan J.; Goldbaum, Gary; Parker, Theodore R.; Hagan, Holly; Marks, Robert; Hanrahan, Michael; Thiede, Hanne (2006-08) -
Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist's Perspective
Chaloupka, Frank J (2011-09)Interventions to reduce childhood obesity entail ethical considerations. Although a rationale exists for government to intervene in a way that limits individual rights while protecting the public's health, a clear economic ...