The Ethics of Pacemaker Deactivation in Terminally Ill Patients
Bevins, Michael B
Journal of pain and symptom management 2011 Jun; 41(6): 1106-10
A core principle of American medical ethics holds that an informed and capacitated patient has the right to have treatments withdrawn or withheld. Nevertheless, many clinicians remain reluctant to honor a request to deactivate a patient's pacemaker. This article describes a case in which a patient was denied her request for pacemaker deactivation. Several reasons for this reluctance are discussed, including historical, practical, and ethical considerations for opposing pacemaker deactivation. Ultimately, however, from an ethical standpoint, pacemaker deactivation is similar to withdrawal of other therapies. Fortunately, a recent expert consensus statement supports a patient's right to have her pacemaker deactivated. Pacemaker deactivation should only be performed after robust informed consent, which must include discussion of risks, benefits, and all viable alternatives based on the patient's values and goals.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Frequency and Perceived Competence in Providing Palliative Care to Terminally Ill Patients: A Survey of Primary Care Physicians Farber, Neil J.; Urban, Susan Y.; Collier, Virginia U.; Metzger, Michael; Weiner, Joan; Boyer, E. Gil (2004-10)
Development of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Policy for the Care of Terminally Ill Patients Who May Become Organ Donors After Death Following the Removal of Life Support DeVita, Michael A.; Snyder, James V. (1993-06)In the mid 1980s it was apparent that the need for organ donors exceeded those willing to donate. Some University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) physicians initiated discussion of possible new organ donor categories including ...