Is Continuous Sedation at the End of Life an Ethically Preferable Alternative to Physician-Assisted Suicide?
The American journal of bioethics : AJOB 2011 Jun; 11(6): 32-40
The relatively new practice of continuous sedation at the end of life (CS) is increasingly being debated in the clinical and ethical literature. This practice received much attention when a U.S. Supreme Court ruling noted that the availability of CS made legalization of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) unnecessary, as CS could alleviate even the most severe suffering. This view has been widely adopted. In this article, we perform an in-depth analysis of four versions of this "argument of preferable alternative." Our goal is to determine the extent to which CS can be considered to be an alternative to PAS and to identify the grounds, if any, on which CS may be ethically preferable to PAS.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Additional Reasons for Not Viewing Continuous Sedation as Preferable Alternative for Physician-Assisted Suicide van de Vathorst, Suzanne; Schermer, Maartje (2011-06)
Pousset, Geert; Bilsen, Johan; Cohen, Joachim; Mortier, Freddy; Deliens, Luc (2011-02)Few guidelines have yet been put forth for continuous deep sedation in pediatrics, and empirical data on the use of this practice in minors are rare.
The Community Speaks: Continuous Deep Sedation as Caregiving Versus Physician-Assisted Suicide as Killing Powers, Carol L; McLean, Paul C (2011-06)