General Practitioners' Conflicts of Interest, the Paramountcy Principle and Safeguarding Children: A Psychodynamic Contribution
Journal of medical ethics 2011 Apr; 37(4): 254-7
Wainwright and Gallagher propose that when child protection concerns emerge significant difficulties arise for General Practitioners because of conflicts between the individual interests of children and parents who are their patients and the Paramountcy Principle. From a psychodynamic perspective their analysis does not give sufficient weight to the nature of personal as opposed to interpersonal conflict of a conscious or unconscious nature. When issues of major import arise, ordinary parenting inevitably involves parents in putting their children's needs first if competing possibilities occur. It is an over-simplification to present this as a conflict between the interests of children and parents. Parents' own best interests are served by securing their children's safety and welfare. An appreciation of this is crucial in order to implement child protection procedures appropriately. Errors may occur because the complex emotions and relationships involved lead professionals to experience themselves as potential agents of harm rather than benefit.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Understanding General Practitioners' Conflicts of Interests and the Paramountcy Principle in Safeguarding Children Wainwright, Paul; Gallagher, Ann (2010-05)As family physicians, general practitioners play a key role in safeguarding children. Should they suspect child abuse or neglect they may experience a conflict between responding to the needs and interests of the child and ...