Normative Ethics Does Not Need a Foundation: It Needs More Science
Van Speybroeck, Linda
Acta biotheoretica 2011 Mar; 59(1): 29-51
The impact of science on ethics forms since long the subject of intense debate. Although there is a growing consensus that science can describe morality and explain its evolutionary origins, there is less consensus about the ability of science to provide input to the normative domain of ethics. Whereas defenders of a scientific normative ethics appeal to naturalism, its critics either see the naturalistic fallacy committed or argue that the relevance of science to normative ethics remains undemonstrated. In this paper, we argue that current scientific normative ethicists commit no fallacy, that criticisms of scientific ethics contradict each other, and that scientific insights are relevant to normative inquiries by informing ethics about the options open to the ethical debate. Moreover, when conceiving normative ethics as being a nonfoundational ethics, science can be used to evaluate every possible norm. This stands in contrast to foundational ethics in which some norms remain beyond scientific inquiry. Finally, we state that a difference in conception of normative ethics underlies the disagreement between proponents and opponents of a scientific ethics. Our argument is based on and preceded by a reconsideration of the notions naturalistic fallacy and foundational ethics. This argument differs from previous work in scientific ethics: whereas before the philosophical project of naturalizing the normative has been stressed, here we focus on concrete consequences of biological findings for normative decisions or on the day-to-day normative relevance of these scientific insights.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Normative Versus Consequential Ethics in Sexually Violent Predator Laws: An Ethics Conundrum for Psychiatry Sreenivasan, Shoba; Frances, Allen; Weinberger, Linda E (2010)Nineteen states and the federal government have statutes for the civil commitment of sexually violent predators (SVP). The American Psychiatric Association has vigorously opposed SVP laws, citing the abuse of both individual ...
Conflict of Interest in Science Communication: More Than a Financial Issue. Report From Esteve Foundation Discussion Group, April 2009 Marcovitch, Harvey; Barbour, Virginia; Borrell, Carme; Bosch, Felix; Fernández, Esteve; Macdonald, Helen; Marusic, Ana; Nylenna, Magne (2010-02)