Early Stopping of Clinical Trials: Charting the Ethical Terrain
Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal 2011 Mar; 21(1): 51-78
The decision to terminate a clinical trial earlier than planned is often described as ethically problematic, but it is rarely systematically analyzed as an ethical issue in its own right. This paper provides an overview of the main ethical considerations at stake in such decisions and of the main tensions between these considerations. Arguments about informed consent and the impact of early stopping on research and society are explored. We devote particular attention to a familiar conflict that arises with special urgency when early data suggest that the experimental treatment is superior. Should the trial be stopped so that participants in the control group will not be allocated a seemingly inferior treatment, or should it continue in pursuit of evidence conclusive enough to improve the care of future patients? We scrutinize three ways to address this problem. Rather than dissolving the tension, they represent different trade-offs between the respective welfare interests of subjects and future patients.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) Framework for Palliative Sedation: An Ethical Discussion Juth, Niklas; Lindblad, Anna; Lynöe, Niels; Sjöstrand, Manne; Helgesson, Gert (2010-09-13)ABSTRACT:
Lynöe, Niels; Juth, Niklas; Helgesson, Gert (2010-02)In a Swedish setting physicians are unlikely to give explicitly paternalistic reasons when asked about their attitudes towards patients' involvement in decision-making. There is considerable risk that they will disguise ...
Juth, Niklas; Tillberg, Therése; Lynöe, Niels (2011-08)The aim of this pilot study was to develop a realistic clinical case for identifying Knobe's asymmetric effect, ie, the tendency to ascribe intentions to a larger extent when an act is considered wrong, as well as to compare ...