Zwangsmaßnahmen in der Psychiatrie - ein Tabu?
Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Österreichischer Nervenärzte und Psychiater 2011; 25(1): 44-50
History shows that the discussion concerning coercive measures against mentally ill is as old as psychiatry itself. The dilemma of psychiatry lies in its double role - having both a therapeutic and a regulatory function. Violence against sick and disabled people conflicts with the ethical principles of helping professions. This, however, is where the danger lies: that the violent parts of psychiatric work - which in the opinion of experts cannot be entirely avoided - are repressed or seen as taboo and are therefore more difficult to control. Comparisons between EU countries of the nature, frequency and duration of coercive measures are difficult because of the heterogeneity of regulation and differences in established practice. Scientific examination of this issue seems to be insufficient. There are only a few studies on important issues such as how patients rate these measures. An open and thorough debate about the meaning and meaninglessness of coercion and violence in psychiatric treatment would be necessary to prevent "routine violence" or the excessive use of force against the mentally ill.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Unterbringung und Zwangsbehandlung in Deutschland. Die feinen Unterschiede zwischen Zivilrecht und öffentlichem Recht Falkenbach, Marc; Jäger, Markus; Neumann, Norbert-Ullrich; Frasch, Karel (2009-03)
Data protection in biomaterial banks for Parkinson's disease research: the model of GEPARD (Gene Bank Parkinson's Disease Germany) Eggert, Karla; Wüllner, Ullrich; Antony, Gisela; Gasser, Thomas; Janetzky, Bernd; Klein, Christine; Schöls, Ludger; Oertel, Wolfgang (2007-04-15)