Pulling the Heartstrings, Arguing the Case: A Narrative Response to the Issue of Moral Agency in Moral Distress
Journal of medical ethics 2010 Dec; 36(12): 746-9
In this paper it is argued that moral distress is an emotional response to an ethical dilemma, and that to date, the literature has largely failed to address the fundamental questions that need to be answered in response to this emotional response. Firstly, does moral distress accurately identify a wrong being done to patients? Secondly, if it does, can nurses carry out this 'wrong doing', but not be responsible for the consequences of their actions? A narrative that reflects the emotional nature of moral distress is presented, with the aim of providing some answers to these questions.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Continuing the Dialogue: Resuscitation of Marginally Viable Neonates -- Response to "Giving 'Moral Distress' a Voice: Ethical Concerns Among Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Personnel," by Pam Hefferman and Steve Heilig, and "Neonatal Viability in the 1990s: Held Hostage by Technology," by Jonathan Muraskas Et Al. (CQ Vol 8, No. 2) Catlin, Anita J.; Carter, Brian S. (2000)
Navigating Turbulent and Uncharted Waters: Response to "Neonatal Viability in the 1990s: Held Hostage by Technology" by Jonathan Muraskas Et Al. and "Giving 'Moral Distress' a Voice: Ethical Concerns Among Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Personnel" by Pam Hefferman and Steve Heilig ( Simpson, Thomas J. (1999)