Equality and the Duty to Retard Human Ageing
Bioethics 2010 Oct; 24(8): 384-94
Where does the aspiration to retard human ageing fit in the 'big picture' of medical necessities and the requirements of just healthcare? Is there a duty to retard human ageing? And if so, how much should we invest in the basic science that studies the biology of ageing and could lead to interventions that modify the biological processes of human ageing? I consider two prominent accounts of equality and just healthcare - Norman Daniels's application of the principle of fair equality of opportunity and Ronald Dworkin's account of equality of resources - and conclude that, once suitably amended and revised, both actually support the conclusion that anti-ageing research is important and could lead to interventions that ought to be considered 'medical necessities'.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Farrelly, Colin (2004-12)The way people think about equality as a value will influence how they think genetic interventions should be regulated. In this paper the author uses the taxonomy of equality put forth by Derek Parfit and applies this to ...
Farrelly, Colin (2004-03)In the newly emerging debates about genetics and justice three distinct principles have begun to emerge concerning what the distributive aim of genetic interventions should be. These principles are: genetic equality, a ...