Diseases as Natural Kinds
Theoretical medicine and bioethics 2010 Oct; 31(5): 347-69
In this paper, I focus on life-threatening medical conditions and argue that from the point of view of natural properties, induction(s), and participation in laws, at least some of the ill organisms dealt with in somatic medicine form natural kinds in the same sense in which the kinds in the exact sciences are thought of as natural. By way of comparing two 'divisions of nature', viz., a 'classical' exact science kind (gold) and a kind of disease (Graves disease), I show that there is no justifiable 'ontological gap' between disease kinds and exact sciences kinds. We have instead a difference of degree.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Sulmasy, Daniel P. (2005)David Thomasma called for the development of a medical ethics based squarely on the philosophy of medicine. He recognized, however, that widespread anti-essentialism presented a significant barrier to such an approach. The ...
Garcia, Laura L. (2008-06)The author focuses on the claim that some human beings are not human persons, and that only human persons deserve the kind of moral regard we expect for ourselves. Drawing from the insights of philosophers Michael Loux and ...
Zachar, Peter (2000-09)