Show simple item record

dc.creatorFovargue, Saraen
dc.creatorMiola, Joséen
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-09T00:40:47Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-09T00:40:47Zen
dc.date.created2010-08en
dc.date.issued2010-08en
dc.identifierdoi:10.1136/jme.2009.032862en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of medical ethics 2010 Aug; 36(8): 494-7en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/1021830en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=One+step+forward,+two+steps+back?+The+GMC,+the+common+law+and+'informed'+consent.&title=Journal+of+medical+ethics+&volume=36&issue=8&date=2010-08&au=Fovargue,+Sara;+Miola,+Joséen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.032862en
dc.description.abstractUntil 2008, if doctors followed the General Medical Council's (GMC's) guidance on providing information prior to obtaining a patient's consent to treatment, they would be going beyond what was technically required by the law. It was hoped that the common law would catch up with this guidance and encourage respect for patients' autonomy by facilitating informed decision-making. Regrettably, this has not occurred. For once, the law's inability to keep up with changing medical practice and standards is not the problem. The authors argue that while the common law has moved forward and started to recognise the importance of patient autonomy and informed decision-making, the GMC has taken a step back in their 2008 guidance on consent. Indeed, doctors are now required to tell their patients less than they were in 1998 when the last guidance was produced. This is an unfortunate development and the authors urge the GMC to revisit their guidance.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceeweb:333931en
dc.subjectAutonomyen
dc.subjectConsenten
dc.subjectDoctorsen
dc.subjectLawen
dc.subjectPatientsen
dc.subjectStandardsen
dc.subject.classificationTruth-tellingen
dc.subject.classificationRight to Health Careen
dc.subject.classificationInformed Consenten
dc.titleOne Step Forward, Two Steps Back? The GMC, the Common Law and 'Informed' Consenten
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2018 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885