Human Dignity and Transhumanism: Do Anthro-Technological Devices Have Moral Status?
The American journal of bioethics : AJOB 2010 Jul; 10(7): 45-52
In this paper, I focus on the concept of human dignity and critically assess whether such a concept, as used in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, is indeed a useful tool for bioethical debates. However, I consider this concept within the context of the development of emerging technologies, that is, with a particular focus on transhumanism. The question I address is not whether attaching artificial limbs or enhancing particular traits or capacities would dehumanize or undignify persons but whether nonbiological entities introduced into or attached to the human body contribute to the "augmentation" of human dignity. First, I outline briefly how the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights uses the concept of dignity. Second, I look at the possibility of a universal bioethics in relation to the concept of human dignity. Third, I examine the concept of posthuman dignity and whether the concept of human dignity as construed in the declaration has any relevance to posthuman dignity.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Human Dignity and Transhumanism: Do Anthro-Technological Devices Have Moral Status? " Jotterand, Fabrice (2010-07)
Sandler, Ronald; Basl, John (2010-07)
Neither convention nor constitution -- what the debate on stem cell research tells us about the status of the common European ethics Schmidt, Kurt W.; Jotterand, Fabrice; Foppa, Carlo (2004-10)