Making Health an Imperative of Foreign Policy: The Value of a Human Rights Approach
Doebbler, Curtis F J
Health and human rights 2010 June 15; 12(1): 47-59
Health is increasingly seen as relevant to foreign policy; nevertheless, it remains subordinate to other interests. In particular, the interests of security and economics are often presented as more critical than health. This is due to a failure to sufficiently recognize the legal obligations that states have undertaken to ensure the human right to health. This article argues that health should be an imperative of foreign policy, equally valid, and prioritized in resource allocation. We suggest application of the human rights approach with attention to the legal duty of cooperation and the necessity of ensuring broad participation. We suggest that the human rights approach to health can contribute to achieving this result and is compatible with, and beneficial to, other foreign policy concerns. Finally, we conclude that the human rights approach to health requires that health be an imperative in foreign policymaking processes.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Clark, Arva R; Sheldon, Alan; McLaughlin, Curtis P (1976-09)
Clark, Arva Rosenfeld; Sheldon, Alan; McLaughlin, Curtis P. (1976-09)
Krogh, Peter F. (Peter Frederic) (The Kentucky NetworkGeorgetown University. School of Foreign ServiceForeign Policy Association, 1998)Examines the driving factors behind human rights abuses and the role of human rights in U.S. foreign policy.