Cultural Cognition and Public Policy: The Case of Outpatient Commitment Laws
Kahan, Dan M
Law and human behavior 2010 Apr; 34(2): 118-40
What explains controversy over outpatient commitment laws (OCLs), which authorize courts to order persons with mental illness to accept outpatient treatment? We hypothesized that attitudes toward OCLs reflect "cultural cognition" (DiMaggio, P. Annl Rev Sociol 23:263-287, 1997), which motivates individuals to conform their beliefs about policy-relevant facts to their cultural values. In a study involving a diverse sample of Americans (N = 1,496), we found that individuals who are hierarchical and communitarian tend to support OCLs, while those who are egalitarian and individualistic tend to oppose them. These relationships, moreover, fit the cultural cognition hypothesis: that is, rather than directly influencing OCL support, cultural values, mediated by affect, shaped individuals' perceptions of how effectively OCLs promote public health and safety. We discuss the implications for informed public deliberation over OCLs.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
What Would Mary Douglas Do? A Commentary on Kahan Et Al., "Cultural Cognition and Public Policy: The Case of Outpatient Commitment Laws" Swanson, Jeffrey (2010-06)Involuntary outpatient commitment is a highly controversial issue in mental health law. Strong supporters of outpatient commitment see it as a form of access to community-based mental health care and a less restrictive ...
Biased Assimilation, Polarization, and Cultural Credibility: An Experimental Study of Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions Kahan, Dan M.; Slovic, Paul; Braman, Donald; Gastil, John; Cohen, Geoffrey, Kysar, Douglas (2008)