Show simple item record

dc.creatorRangel, Erica Ken
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-09T00:42:07Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-09T00:42:07Zen
dc.date.created2010-03en
dc.date.issued2010-03en
dc.identifierdoi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00471.xen
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2010 Spring; 38(1): 117-26en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=The+management+of+incidental+findings+in+neuro-imaging+research:+framework+and+recommendations.&title=The+Journal+of+law,+medicine+&+ethics+:+a+journal+of+the+American+Society+of+Law,+Medicine+&+Ethics+&volume=38&issue=1&date=2010-03&au=Rangel,+Erica+Ken
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00471.xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/1024047en
dc.description.abstractThis paper addresses the question of how incidental findings (IFs) in clinical research should be managed by researchers, focusing in detail on IFs discovered in neuroimaging research. It begins by engaging the larger research ethics issue of whether researchers have any obligations of clinical care to participants, and assesses the content and merits of one particular framework for answering this question, Richardson and Belsky's ancillary care model. From here the paper develops an organizational structure for integrating the ancillary care model with existing research ethics standards, with the aim of better understanding their respective domains. It makes a distinction between incidental findings that are anticipated by informed consent documents, and those that are unanticipated, arguing that this distinction is critical for evaluating researcher obligations. Finally, it takes on the issue of incidental findings in neuroimaging research, translating the standards discussed into recommendations for both unanticipated and anticipated findings.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceeweb:330965en
dc.subjectClinical Researchen
dc.subjectConsenten
dc.subjectEthicsen
dc.subjectIncidental Findingsen
dc.subjectResearchen
dc.subjectResearch Ethicsen
dc.subjectResearchersen
dc.subjectStandardsen
dc.subject.classificationTruth-tellingen
dc.subject.classificationNeurosciences and Mental Health Therapiesen
dc.subject.classificationHuman Experimentation Policy Guidelines / Institutional Review Boardsen
dc.titleThe Management of Incidental Findings in Neuro-Imaging Research: Framework and Recommendationsen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2022 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885