Confidence and Conflicts of Duty in Surgery
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2010 March; 92(2): 113-117
This paper offers an exploration of the right to confidentiality, considering the moral importance of private information. It is shown that the legitimate value that individuals derive from confidentiality stems from the public interest. It is re-assuring, therefore, that public interest arguments must be made to justify breaches of confidentiality. The General Medical Council's guidance gives very high importance to duties to maintain confidences, but also rightly acknowledges that, at times, there are more important duties that must be met. Nevertheless, this potential conflict of obligations may place the surgeon in difficult clinical situations, and examples of these are described, together with suggestions for resolution.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Woodcock, Tom; Wheeler, Robert (2010-05)This article in the series describes how UK law and medical ethics have evolved to accommodate developments in organ transplantation surgery. August committees have formulated definitions of the point of death of the person ...
Professional Values, Value Conflicts, and Assessments of the Duty-Hour Restrictions After Six Years: A Multi-Institutional Study of Surgical Faculty and Residents Coverdill, James E; Carbonell, Alfredo M; Cogbill, Thomas H; Fryer, Jonathan; Fuhrman, George M; Harold, Kristi L; Hiatt, Jonathan R; Moore, Richard A; Nakayama, Don K; Nelson, M Timothy; Schlatter, Marc; Sidwell, Richard A; Tarpley, John L; Termuhlen, Paula M; Wohltmann, Christopher; Mellinger, John D (2011-01)the aim of this study was to explore professional values, value conflicts, and assessments of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's duty-hour restrictions.