Show simple item record

dc.creatorParker, Malcolmen
dc.creatorZhang, Jianzhenen
dc.creatorWilkinson, Daviden
dc.creatorPeterson, Raymonden
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-09T00:42:25Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-09T00:42:25Zen
dc.date.created2010-02en
dc.date.issued2010-02en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Law and Medicine 2010 February; 17(4): 493-501en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Four+decades+of+complaints+to+a+State+Medical+Board+about+graduates+from+one+medical+school:+implications+for+change+in+self-regulation+processes.&title=Journal+of+Law+and+Medicine+&volume=17&issue=4&date=2010-02&au=Parker,+Malcolm;+Zhang,+Jianzhen;+Wilkinson,+David;+Peterson,+Raymonden
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/1024567en
dc.description.abstractIn the context of the impending national registration of health practitioners in Australia including doctors, this column describes the types and patterns of complaints to a State Medical Board across an extended period, about graduates from one medical school. De-identified data concerning complaints about medical practitioners who had graduated from the University of Queensland, made to the Medical Board of Queensland between 1968 and 2006, were analysed. The main outcome measures were category of complaint, total complaint rate per doctor-year, frequency of complaints per practitioner and outcomes of complaints. There were 12 categories of complaints, encompassing different aspects of clinical management, impairment and unethical conduct. Outcomes included "no further action", a hierarchy of recommendations and conditions on registration, suspension, deregistration, health assessment, or referral to alternative bodies. Complaints predominantly related to clinical standards, and this also applied to those who attracted multiple complaints. Most cases were managed without resort to sanctions of any kind. Sanctions may be underutilised, particularly in cases of apparent recalcitrance. Improved tracking and appropriate reeducation and disciplinary measures will assist in better protecting the public under the new national registration arrangements.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceeweb:330246en
dc.subjectDoctorsen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectRegulationen
dc.subjectStandardsen
dc.subject.classificationEducation for Health Care Professionalsen
dc.subject.classificationProfessional Misconducten
dc.titleFour Decades of Complaints to a State Medical Board About Graduates From One Medical School: Implications for Change in Self-Regulation Processesen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2022 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885