The Concept of Disease -- Vague, Complex, or Just Indefinable?
Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 2010 February; 13(1): 3-10
The long ongoing and partly heated debate on the concept of disease has not led to any consensus on the status of this apparently essential concept for modern health care. The arguments range from claims that the disease concept is vague, slippery, elusive, or complex, and to statements that the concept is indefinable and unnecessary. The unsettled status of the concept of disease is challenging not only to health care where diagnosing, treating, and curing disease are core aims, but also to the branch of philosophy that tries to clarify concepts. This article discusses three claims about the concept of disease: that it is vague, complex, and that it is indefinable. It investigates (a) what is meant by these claims (b) what their implications are, and (c) whether the claims are sound or not. It is argued that some of the arguments are flawed and miss important points about concept analysis. This does not mean, however, that disease is a clear concept with a crisp definition. It only rules out speculative claims that disease necessarily is vague, complex, and indefinable. It appears at least as hard to show that disease is indefinable as it is to define it.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
The inference from a single case: moral versus scientific inferences in implementing new biotechnologies Hofmann, Bjørn (2008-06)Are there similarities between scientific and moral inference? This is the key question in this article. It takes as its point of departure an instance of one person s story in the media changing both Norwegian public ...
Hofmann, Bjørn (2009-02)Biobank research is potentially fruitful. It is argued that broad consent is acceptable for future research on biological material because a) the benefit is high, b) it pays respect to people's autonomy, c) it is consistent ...