Data Integrity, Reliability and Fraud in Medical Research
Baerlocher, Mark Otto
European Journal of Internal Medicine 2010 February; 21(1): 40-45
BACKGROUND: Data reliability in original research requires collective trust from the academic community. Standards exist to ensure data integrity, but these safeguards are applied non-uniformly so errors or even fraud may still exist in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence and consequences of data errors, data reliability safeguards and fraudulent data among medical academics. METHODOLOGY: Corresponding authors of every fourth primary research paper published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (2001-2003), Canadian Medical Association Journal (2001-2003), British Medical Journal (1998-2000), and Lancet (1998-2000) were surveyed electronically. Questions focused on each author's personal experience with data reliability, data errors and data interpretation. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent (127/195) of corresponding authors responded. Ninety-four percent of respondents accepted full responsibility for the integrity of the last manuscript on which they were listed as co-author; however, 21% had discovered incorrect data after publication in previous manuscripts they had co-authored. Fraudulent data was discovered by 4% of respondents in their previous work. Four percent also noted 'smudged' data. Eighty-seven percent of respondents used data reliability safeguards in their last published manuscript, typically data review by multiple authors or double data entry. Twenty-one percent were involved in a paper that was submitted despite disagreement about the interpretation of the results, although the disagreeing author commonly withdrew from authorship. CONCLUSIONS: Data reliability remains a difficult issue in medical literature. A significant proportion of respondents did not use data reliability safeguards. Research fraud does exist in academia; however, it was not reported to be highly prevalent.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Measuring How People View Biomedical Research: Reliability and Validity Analysis of the Research Attitudes Questionnaire Rubright, Jonathan D; Cary, Mark S; Karlawish, Jason H; Kim, Scott Y H (2011-03)With increasing numbers of studies on research ethics and a need to improve the recruitment of research subjects, the ability to measure attitudes toward biomedical research has become important. The Research Attitudes ...
Do Attending Physicians, Nurses, Residents, and Medical Students Agree on What Constitutes Medical Student Abuse? Ogden, Paul E.; Wu, Edward H.; Elnicki, Michael D.; Battistone, Michael J.; Cleary, Lynn M.; Fagan, Mark J.; Friedman, Erica; Gliatto, Peter M.; Harrell, Heather E.; Jennings, May S.; Ledford, Cynthia H.; Mechaber, Alex J.; Mintz, Matthew; O'Brien, Kevin; Thomas, Matthew R.; Wong, Raymond Y. (2005-10)
Faden, Ruth R.; Dawson, Liza; Bateman-House, Alison S.; Agnew, Dawn Mueller; Bok, Hilary; Brock, Dan W.; Chakravarti, Aravinda; Gao, Xiao-Jiang; Greene, Mark; Hansen, John A.; King, Patricia A.; O'Brien, Stephen J.; Sachs, David H.; Schill, Kathryn E.; Sie (2003-11)