Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Guide for Clinicians
Creator
Loertscher, Laura
Reed, Darcy A.
Bannon, Michael P.
Mueller, Paul S.
Bibliographic Citation
American Journal of Medicine 2010 January; 123(1): 4-9
Abstract
The do-not-resuscitate order, introduced nearly a half century ago, continues to raise questions and controversy among health care providers and patients. In today's society, the expectation and availability of medical interventions, including at the end of life, have rendered the do-not-resuscitate order particularly relevant. The do-not-resuscitate order is the only order that requires patient consent to prevent a medical procedure from being performed; therefore, informed code status discussions between physicians and patients are especially important. Epidemiologic studies have informed our understanding of resuscitation outcomes; however, patient, provider, and institutional characteristics account for great variability in the prevalence of do-not-resuscitate orders. Specific strategies can improve the quality of code status conversations and enhance end-of-life care planning. In this article, we review the history, epidemiology, and determinants of do-not-resuscitate orders, as well as frequently encountered questions and recommended strategies for discussing this important topic with patients.
Date
2010-01Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Survey of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Nursing Homes
Levinson, Wendy; Shepard, Mary A.; Dunn, Patrick M.; Parker, Dorothy F. (1987-12)