Show simple item record

dc.creatorStrech, Danielen
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-09T00:45:19Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-09T00:45:19Zen
dc.date.created2010en
dc.date.issued2010en
dc.identifierdoi:10.1016/j.zefq.2010.09.019en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationZeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 2010; 104(8-9): 674-81en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/1025653en
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2010.09.019en
dc.description.abstractHardly any academic research has been conducted on physician rating sites (PRS) with regard to their medical and ethical implications. In the public media, however, representatives of health care providers and payers have been involved in a controversial debate on the, at least, possible implications and practical consequences resulting from PRS.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languagedeen
dc.sourceeweb:328834en
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectHealth Careen
dc.subjectResearchen
dc.subject.classificationPatient Relationshipsen
dc.subject.classificationInformation Science Ethicsen
dc.subject.classificationPhilosophy of Medicineen
dc.titleArztbewertungsportale Aus Ethischer Perspektive. Eine Orientierende Analyseen
dc.title.alternativePhysician rating sites from an ethical viewpoint: a roadmapen
dc.title.alternativeenen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2022 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885