Principlism, Medical Individualism, and Health Promotion in Resource-Poor Countries: Can Autonomy-Based Bioethics Promote Social Justice and Population Health?
Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM 2010 5(): 1
Through its adoption of the biomedical model of disease which promotes medical individualism and its reliance on the individual-based anthropology, mainstream bioethics has predominantly focused on respect for autonomy in the clinical setting and respect for person in the research site, emphasizing self-determination and freedom of choice. However, the emphasis on the individual has often led to moral vacuum, exaggeration of human agency, and a thin (liberal?) conception of justice. Applied to resource-poor countries and communities within developed countries, autonomy-based bioethics fails to address the root causes of diseases and public health crises with which individuals or communities are confronted. A sociological explanation of disease causation is needed to broaden principles of biomedical ethics and provides a renewed understanding of disease, freedom, medical practice, patient-physician relationship, risk and benefit of research and treatment, research priorities, and health policy.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
On the Road to Social Justice: Assessing Cairo Review of Women, Population and Global Crisis: A Political-Economic Analysis, by Asoka Bandarage; Population and Reproductive Rights: Feminist Perspectives From the South, by Sonia Correa And Rebecca Reichmann; Population and Development, Edited by Paul Demeny and Geoffrey McNicoll; Negotiating Reproductive Rights: Women's Perspectives Across Countries and Cultures, by Rosalind P. Petchesky and Karen Judd; Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control, by Betsy Hartmann; Coping With Population Challenges, by Louise Lassonde; Empowerment and Women's Health, by Jane Stein; Creating a New Consensus on Population, by Jyoti Shankar Singh Harcourt, Wendy (1999-03)