Cultural Circumcision in EU Public Hospitals -- an Ethical Discussion
Bioethics 2009 October; 23(8): 470-482
The paper explores the ethical aspects of introducing cultural circumcision of children into the EU public health system. We reject commonplace arguments against circumcision: considerations of good medical practice, justice, bodily integrity, autonomy and the analogy from female genital mutilation. From the unique structure of patient-medicine interaction, we argue that the incorporation of cultural circumcision into EU public health services is a kind of medicalization, which does not fit the ethos of universal healthcare. However, we support a utilitarian argument that finds hospital based circumcision safer than non-medicalized alternatives. The argument concerning medicalization and the utilitarian argument both rely on preliminary empirical data, which depend on future validation
Permanent LinkFind in a Library
Full Text from Publisher
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Barilan, Y. Michael (2006-09)Accepting the claim that the living have some moral duties with regard to dead bodies, this paper explores those duties and how they bear on the popular travelling exhibition Bodyworlds. I argue that the concept of informed ...
Male Circumcision and HIV Prevention: Ethical, Medical and Public Health Tradeoffs in Low-Income Countries: Ethical Challenges Surrounding the Implementation of Male Circumcision as an HIV Prevention Strategy Rennie, Stuart; Muula, Adamson S.; Westreich, Daniel (2007-06)
Rationalising Circumcision: From Tradition to Fashion, From Public Health to Individual Freedom -- Critical Notes on Cultural Persistence of the Practice of Genital Mutilation Hellsten, S.K. (2004-06)Despite global and local attempts to end genital mutilation, in their various forms, whether of males or females, the practice has persisted throughout human history in most parts of the world. Various medical, scientific, ...