Federal Provider Conscience Regulation: Unconscionable
Journal of Medical Ethics 2009 August; 35(8): 471-472
This paper argues that the provider conscience regulation recently put into place in the USA is misguided. The rule is too broad in the scope of protection it affords, and its conception of what constitutes assistance in the performance of an objectionable procedure reveals that it is unworkable in practice. Furthermore, the regulation wrongly treats refusal of other reproductive services as on a par with conscientious objection to participation in abortion. Finally, the rule allows providers to refuse even to discuss "objectionable" options with patients and serves to protect discriminatory refusals of medical care. For all of these reasons, this regulation is unwise.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Regulation for the Enforcement of Federal Health Care Provider Conscience Protection Laws. Final Rule Unknown author (Office of the Secretary, HHS, 2011-02-23)The Department of Health and Human Services issues this final rule which provides that enforcement of the federal statutory health care provider conscience protections will be handled by the Department's Office for Civil ...
Rudd, Gene (2007-11)
"Conscience Clauses" or "Unconscionable Clauses": Personal Beliefs Versus Professional Responsibilities Swartz, Martha S. (2006-06)