"They Just Don't Get It!" When Family Disagrees With Expert Opinion
Journal of Medical Ethics 2009 August; 35(8): 497-501
The notions of "expert" and "expertise" imply that some people have more credibility than others on certain matters. While expert authority is often taken for granted, there are questions as to whether expert power in some cases can be a form of epistemic oppression. Informed by bedside disagreements between family and clinicians as well as feminist discussions of epistemic oppression, this paper argues for a commitment to epistemic humility and the adoption of a two-way collaborative approach between clinicians and families that can help to enhance professionals' own understanding of their theoretical framework and also promote responsive patient care.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Rabow, Michael W.; Hauser, Joshua M.; Adams, Jocelia (2004-01-28)Even for patients receiving complex, intensive medical care for serious and life-threatening illness, family caregiving is typically at the core of what sustains patients at the end of life. The amorphous relationship ...
Ethics in Action. an Elderly Man With No Living Relatives Has Made It Clear, Both Verbally and Through Written Advance Directive, That He Doesn't Want to Be Coded. His Physician, However, Has Repeatedly Refused to Write a DNR Order. a Colleague Tells You: "Don't Worry. When He Codes, We'll Just Take Our Time Responding. That's How We Handle Things Around Here." What Would You Do? Haddad, Amy (1996-07)
When the Subject Is More Than Just the Subject: Two Case Studies of Family Involvement in Human Subjects Research Sauder, Sara; Stein, Rachel; Feinberg, Emily; Bauchner, Howard; Banks, Mary; Silverstein, Michael (2011-03)Institutional review boards (IRBs) protect human research subjects by reviewing research to ensure compliance with federal regulations and institutional policies. One of the most important functions of IRBs is to ensure ...