International Public Health Law: Not So Much WHO as Why, and Not Enough WHO and Why Not?
Harmon, Shawn H.E.
Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 2009 August; 12(3): 245-255
To state the obvious, "health matters", but health (or its equitable enjoyment) is neither simple nor easy. Public health in particular, which encompasses a broad collection of complex and multidisciplinary activities which are critical to the wellbeing and security of individuals, populations and nations, is a difficult milieu to master effectively. In fact, despite the vital importance of public health, there is a relative dearth of ethico-legal norms tailored for, and directed at, the public health sector, particularly at the international level. This is a state of affairs which is no longer tenable in the global environment. This article argues that public health promotion is a moral duty, and that international actors are key stakeholders upon whom this duty falls. In particular, the World Health Organization bears a heavy responsibility in this regard. The article claims that better health can and must be better promoted through a more robust interpretation of the WHO's role, arguing that neither the WHO nor international law have yet played their necessary part in promoting health for all.
Permanent LinkFind in a Library
Full Text from Publisher
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Not "human" enough to be human but not "animal" enough to be animal - the case of the HFEA, cybrids and xenotransplantation in the UK Haddow, Gill; Bruce, Ann; Calvert, Jane; Harmon, Shawn H.E.; Marsden, Wendy (2010-03)