Online Survey Tools: Ethical and Methodological Concerns of Human Research Ethics Committees
Buchanan, Elizabeth A.
Hvizdak, Erin E.
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2009 June; 4(2): 37-48
A SURVEY OF 750 UNIVERSITY HUMAN Research Ethics Boards (HRECs) in the United States revealed that Internet research protocols involving online or Web surveys are the type most often reviewed (94% of respondents), indicating the growing prevalence of this methodology for academic research. Respondents indicated that the electronic and online nature of these survey data challenges traditional research ethics principles such as consent, risk, privacy, anonymity, confidentiality, and autonomy, and adds new methodological complexities surrounding data storage, security, sampling, and survey design. Interesting discrepancies surfaced among respondents regarding strengths and weaknesses within extant guidelines, which are highlighted throughout the paper. The paper concludes with considerations and suggestions towards consistent protocol review of online surveys to ensure appropriate human subjects protections in the face of emergent electronic tools and methodologies.
Autonomy; Consent; Ethics; Ethics Committees; Guidelines; Internet; Nature; Prevalence; Privacy; Research; Research Ethics; Research Ethics Committees; Review; Risk; Survey; Surveys; Confidentiality; Human Experimentation Policy Guidelines / Institutional Review Boards; Information Science Ethics; Informed Consent;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Computer Science Security Research and Human Subjects: Emerging Considerations for Research Ethics Boards Buchanan, Elizabeth; Aycock, John; Dexter, Scott; Dittrich, David; Hvizdak, Erin (2011-06)This paper explores the growing concerns with computer science research, and in particular, computer security research and its relationship with the committees that review human subjects research. It offers cases that ...