Standards for Research Ethics Committees: Purpose, Problems and the Possibilities of Other Approaches
Journal of Medical Ethics 2009 June; 35(6): 382-383
Criticism of ethical review of research continues and research ethics committees (RECs) need to demonstrate that they are "fit for purpose" by meeting acknowledged standards of process, debate and outcome. This paper reports a workshop in Warsaw in April 2008, organised by the European Forum for Good Clinical Practice, on the problems of setting standards for RECs in the European Union. Representatives from 27 countries were invited; 16 were represented. Problems identified were the limited and variable resources, difficulties of setting standards for ethical debate and its outcomes and that REC members, as volunteers, may resent the imposition of standards. Other ways to set standards were discussed, including analysis of current multicentre review, collecting REC member reports for review, learning from appeals and feedback from applicants, and use of other regional and national meetings. The place of a central, national board or ethics committee was debated as was the need for collaborating with partners in other fields.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
How Can We Provide Effective Training for Research Ethics Committee Members? A European Assessment Davies, H.; Wells, F.; Druml, C. (2008-04)Training for members of research ethics committees (RECs) varies from state to state in Europe. To follow this up, the European Forum for Good Clinical Practice organised a workshop in March 2007 to explore these issues ...