Should or Should Not Forensic Psychiatrists Think About Free Will?
Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 2009 May; 12(2): 203-212
The forensic psychiatrist's task is often considered to be tightly connected to the concept of free will. Yet, there is also a lack of clarity about the role of the concept of free will in forensic psychiatry. Recently, Morse has argued that forensic psychiatrists should not mention free will in their reports or testimonies, and, moreover, that they should not even think about free will. Starting from a discussion on Morse's claims, I will develop my own view on how forensic psychiatrists are confronted with the issue of free will and how they should deal with this concept and the confusion surrounding it. I conclude that psychiatrists should at least feel free to think about free will and that the conceptual challenges connected to the issues of free will and accountability could rather encourage than deter forensic psychiatrists to think about them.
Permanent LinkFind in a Library
Full Text from Publisher
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Free Will and Psychiatric Assessments of Criminal Responsibility: A Parallel With Informed Consent Meynen, Gerben (2010-11)In some criminal cases a forensic psychiatrist is asked to make an assessment of the state of mind of the defendant at the time of the legally relevant act. A considerable number of people seem to hold that the basis for ...
Meynen, Gerben (2010-12)A link between mental disorder and freedom is clearly present in the introduction of the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). It mentions "an important loss of freedom" as ...
Simon, Robert I. (2003)