Paternalism and Fairness in Clinical Research
Jansen, Lynn A
Bioethics 2009 March; 23(3): 172-182
In this paper, we defend the ethics of clinical research against the charge of paternalism. We do so not by denying that the ethics of clinical research is paternalistic, but rather by defending the legitimacy of paternalism in this context. Our aim is not to defend any particular set of paternalistic restrictions, but rather to make a general case for the permissibility of paternalistic restrictions in this context. Specifically, we argue that there is no basic liberty-right to participate in clinical research and that considerations of distributive fairness justify some paternalistic protections of research subjects.
Permanent LinkFind in a Library
Full Text from Publisher
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Jansen, Lynn A. (2010-02)It is often claimed that the intentions of physicians are multiple, ambiguous, and uncertain-at least with respect to end-of-life care. This claim provides support for the conclusion that the principle of double effect is ...