Paternalism and Fairness in Clinical Research
Jansen, Lynn A
Bioethics 2009 March; 23(3): 172-182
In this paper, we defend the ethics of clinical research against the charge of paternalism. We do so not by denying that the ethics of clinical research is paternalistic, but rather by defending the legitimacy of paternalism in this context. Our aim is not to defend any particular set of paternalistic restrictions, but rather to make a general case for the permissibility of paternalistic restrictions in this context. Specifically, we argue that there is no basic liberty-right to participate in clinical research and that considerations of distributive fairness justify some paternalistic protections of research subjects.
Permanent LinkFind in a Library
Full Text from Publisher
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Jansen, Lynn A. (1998-03)"Clinical pragmatism" is an important new method of moral problem-solving in clinical practice. This method draws on the pragmatic philosophy of John Dewey and recommends an experimental approach to solving moral problems ...