Is science an instrument of competing power in the exercising of jurisdictional activity?
Journal International de Bioéthique = International Journal of Bioethics 2006 March-June; 17(1-2): 33-54
The growing complexity of the relations between scientific and judicial logic in procedures raises the question of the modification of the function of judge who,from having a role as decision-maker can find himself restricted to the role of regulator of a mechanism leading to a conclusion which eludes him. On the other hand, the technician, to the same degree, acquires real power over the content of the judicial truth. As a result, in certain areas, scientific knowledge tends to compete with the exercising of jurisdictional activity. However, it would be excessive to deduce resignation on the part of the judge in favour of the technician: the application of the rules of trial to scientific data along with the emergence of guiding principles for the scientific phase allows the judge to instrumentalise knowledge in favour of the fairest solution.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
"A man who wants to make a good instument must first have a precise understanding of what the instrument is to be used for" (Giulio Douet, the Command of the Air). The use of air power in resolving early twenty-first century conflict Malins, Harry (2010-01-26)The nature of conflict in the twenty-first century is changing. In order to optimise the use of air power in the resolution of conflict in the coming decades an increasing emphasis on airlift, surveillance and UAVs will ...
THE POWER AND LIMITATIONS OF BASEBALL AS A CULTURAL INSTRUMENT OF DIPLOMACY IN US-JAPANESE RELATIONS McCagg, David Goto (Georgetown University, 2015)Almost from the opening of Japan to the West in the mid-nineteenth century, baseball has been used by both the governments of Japan and the United States to further their national aims--whether those aims were to wage peace ...