Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2016-03-18T17:38:50Zen
dc.date.available2016-03-18T17:38:50Zen
dc.date.created1995-12-22en
dc.date.issued1995-12-22en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationFederal Supplement 1995; 912: 580-596en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/1037589en
dc.description.abstractCourt Decision: 912 Federal Supplement 580; 1995 December 22 (date of decision). The U.S. District Court for the District of Maine held that a dentist violated the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA") and the Maine Human Rights Act ("MHRA") in refusing to fill the cavity of a person infected with HIV, wholly asymptomatic. The dentist had agreed to fill the patient's cavity, yet only in a hospital with the patient to pay the dentist's normal fee in addition to any hospital charges. The court held that asymptomatic HIV infection constitutes a physical impairment for the purposes of the ADA and the MHRA as it interferes with the major life activities of reproduction. Similarly, the court held that here the dentist could not prove that the patient or her treatment posed a direct threat to the health or safety of others. In its analysis, the court rejected the CDC recommendations as to the employment of HIV infected health care workers as the risk at issue was not the transmission of HIV from worker to patient, but that of patient to dentist infection, a case in which the professional controls the risk of infection. Finally, the court rejected the dentist's arguments that the ADA, as applied here, violated the Interstate Commerce Clause, the Due Process Right to freedom from unjustified intrusions on personal security, and the Due Process Right to freedom to contract. The court enjoined the dentist from refusing to provide treatment solely based on HIV positive status without making an individualized assessment. [KIE/SP]en
dc.formatCourt Decisionen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherUnited States. District Court, District of Maineen
dc.sourceeweb:158301en
dc.subjectCommerceen
dc.subjectDue Processen
dc.subjectEmploymenten
dc.subjectFreedomen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectHealth Careen
dc.subjectHuman Rightsen
dc.subjectLifeen
dc.subjectReproductionen
dc.subjectRightsen
dc.subjectRisken
dc.subject.classificationConcept of Healthen
dc.subject.classificationRight to Health Careen
dc.subject.classificationAcquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome or HIV Infectionen
dc.titleBragdon v. Abbotten
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2017 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885