Exploring the Similarities and Differences Between Medical Assessments of Competence and Criminal Responsibility
Medicine, health care, and philosophy 2009 Nov ; 12(4): 443-51
The medical assessments of criminal responsibility and competence to consent to treatment are performed, developed and debated in distinct domains. In this paper I try to connect these domains by exploring the similarities and differences between both assessments. In my view, in both assessments a decision-making process is evaluated in relation to the possible influence of a mental disorder on this process. I will argue that, in spite of the relevance of the differences, both practices could benefit from the recognition of this similarity. For cooperative research could be developed directed at elucidating exactly how various mental disturbances can affect decision-making processes.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Free Will and Psychiatric Assessments of Criminal Responsibility: A Parallel With Informed Consent Meynen, Gerben (2010-11)In some criminal cases a forensic psychiatrist is asked to make an assessment of the state of mind of the defendant at the time of the legally relevant act. A considerable number of people seem to hold that the basis for ...
Meynen, Gerben (2010-12)A link between mental disorder and freedom is clearly present in the introduction of the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). It mentions "an important loss of freedom" as ...
Meynen, Gerben (2011-06)Competent decision-making is required for informed consent. In this paper, I aim, from a phenomenological perspective, to identify the specific facets of competent decision-making that may form a challenge to depressed ...