Safer Self-Injury or Assisted Self-Harm?
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2010 February; 31(1): 79-92
Psychiatric patients may try (or express a desire) to injure themselves in hospital in order to cope with overwhelming emotional pain. Some health care practitioners and patients propose allowing a controlled amount of self-injury to occur in inpatient facilities, so as to prevent escalation of distress. Is this approach an example of professional assistance with harm? Or, is the approach more likely to minimise harm, by ensuring safer self-injury? In this article, I argue that health care practitioners who use harm-minimisation can be considered to be helping physical injury to occur, although they do not encourage the act. I consider why there are compelling reasons to believe that a patient who self-injures is not maximally autonomous in relation to that choice. However, I then move onto argue that allowing a degree of self-injury may enable engagement with psychotherapy (enhancing autonomy) and behavioural change. In these circumstances, allowing injury (with precautions) may not be harm, all things considered.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Kelly, Brendan D (2011-07)There are significant points of similarity between considerations of self-harm and suicide in Buddhist and non-Buddhist traditions, including qualified acceptance of certain forms of self-harm, altruism as a motivation for ...
Edwards, Steven D; Hewitt, Jeanette (2011-01)It was reported in 2006 that a regime of 'supervised self harm' had been implemented at St George's Hospital, Stafford. This involves patients with a history of self-harming behaviour being offered both emotional and ...