The Future of Bioethics: Three Dogmas and a Cup of Hemlock
Bioethics 2010 Jun; 24(5): 218-25
In this paper I argue that bioethics is in crisis and that it will not have a future unless it begins to embrace a more Socratic approach to its leading assumptions. The absence of a critical and sceptical spirit has resulted in little more than a dominant ideology. I focus on three key issues. First, that too often bioethics collapses into medical ethics. Second, that medical ethics itself is beset by a lack of self-reflection that I characterize here as a commitment to three dogmas. Third, I offer a more positive perspective by suggesting how bioethics may benefit from looking towards public health ethics as a new source of inspiration and direction.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Paul, Yash; Dawson, Angus (2005-08)The World Health Organisation's programme for the eradication of poliomyelitis as currently practised in India raises many ethical issues. In this paper we concentrate on just two. The first is the balance to be struck ...
Dawson, Angus; Wrigley, Anthony (2010-04)
Wilson, James; Dawson, Angus (2010-03)