Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of Linguistics
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Linguistics
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of Linguistics
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Linguistics
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Negotiating Power through Tag Questions in Crisis Negotiations

    Cover for Negotiating Power through Tag Questions in Crisis Negotiations
    View/Open
    View/Open: Rubin_georgetown_0076M_13326.pdf (444kB) Bookview

    Creator
    Rubin, Gabriela Beyatriz
    Advisor
    Schilling, Natalie A
    ORCID
    0000-0003-4625-4594
    Abstract
    Crisis negotiation is a unique form of law enforcement–civilian interaction, as the crime is ongoing at the time of the exchange. Consequently, crisis negotiators have the opportunity to positively influence the outcome of the incident. In order to accomplish this, negotiators must both manage the dynamic power relations and build rapport with the subject. In this paper, I explore the use of tag questions in crisis negotiations to simultaneously minimize power asymmetries and build rapport with the subject in order to exert influence over the subject and bring the crisis incident to a non-violent conclusion.
     
    To identify the specific functions that tag questions fulfill in the pursuit of these overarching goals, I apply Holmes’ (1995) taxonomy of tag questions to negotiators’ tag questions from five different crisis incidents. Holmes (1995) divides tag questions into four types: modal, facilitative, softening, and challenging. Focusing primarily on facilitative and softening tag questions, I take an Interactional Sociolinguistic approach to ascertain what discursive functions the facilitative and softening tag questions are fulfilling for the negotiators in each incident. I supplement my analysis of the discourse of the five crisis incidents with five subject matter expert interviews in order to ground my research in the experiences of career FBI negotiators.
     
    I find that in instances where the negotiator and the subject both perceive the negotiator as the more powerful interlocutor, facilitative and softening tag questions are valuable discursive tools for: 1) reinforcing a ‘collaborative problem solving’ frame (Tannen & Wallat, 1993) minimizing the significance of the subject’s negative actions, and 3) turning orders into requests to influence the subject’s decision-making. The successful use of tag questions for these purposes allows the negotiator to appear empathic while maintaining control of the overall situation. However, I find that in situations where the subject perceives himself or herself as more powerful than the negotiator, tag questions are a less effective tool. The results of this study contribute to ongoing research in linguistics regarding the relationship between power and tag questions and offer insights to crisis negotiators into how linguistic tools can be used to accomplish their goals.
     
    Description
    M.S.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1040756
    Date Published
    2016
    Subject
    crisis negotiations; discourse analysis; influence; power; tag questions; training; Linguistics; Linguistics;
    Type
    thesis
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Extent
    67 leaves
    Collections
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Linguistics
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Cover for Why Do Guerrilla Groups That Had Enough Capabilities to Continue in an Armed Struggle Shift Their Strategies from Military to Political and Participate in Negotiations?

      Why Do Guerrilla Groups That Had Enough Capabilities to Continue in an Armed Struggle Shift Their Strategies from Military to Political and Participate in Negotiations? 

      Murillo Armijo, Gabriela (Georgetown University, 2021)
      *no abstract*
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility