Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • Program of Asian Studies
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • Program of Asian Studies
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Structural and Ideological Barriers that Perpetuate the Implementation Gap in South Korean Women’s Empowerment Policie

    Cover for Structural and Ideological Barriers that Perpetuate the Implementation Gap in South Korean Women’s Empowerment Policie
    View/Open
    View/Open: Falvey_georgetown_0076M_14037.pdf (278kB) Bookview

    Creator
    Falvey, Hannah R.
    Advisor
    Looney, Kristen
    Green, Michael
    Abstract
    This thesis examines the structural and cultural barriers that perpetuate the implementation gap in South Korean women’s empowerment policies while asking the primary research question: despite having a strong women's empowerment policy why does South Korea have such a massive policy implementation gap to rank the lowest for women's empowerment consistently? Many scholars have argued that the Confucian cultural roots and the resulting gender-biased ideology is the main barrier to integrating and advancing women within the South Korean workforce. However, closer examination calls for this argument to be extended to for a need to reexamine existing policy which never attempted to address the situational context: a gender-biased economic development model and workplace structure fueled by a sexist cultural ideology. More directly, I argue that the implementation gap in women's empowerment policies in the South Korean workforce is a combination of the government's laissez-faire approach to women's empowerment that allows for glaring structural work-life balance issues to persist, solidified by cultural ideology. Issues that structurally contribute to work-life balance include 1.) Insufficient tangible support for childcare by the South Korean government 2.) Excessively long work and overtime expectations, and 3.) Overdependence on the private sector to support women’s empowerment. In turn, the incompatibility of work and domestic responsibilities force South Korean women to exit the workforce. The exit of women results in the mitigation of the significant economic potential that South Korean women’s empowerment policies possess should they be implemented. Furthermore, work-life balance issues cause the accentuation of underlying sexism in the creation of a gendered workforce with the overrepresentation of women in temporary and entry-level positions, in addition to hiring and promotion practices, and normalized gender roles.
    Description
    M.A.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1050739
    Date Published
    2018
    Subject
    Childcare; cultural ideology; Overtime; South Korea; Women's empowerment; work-life balance; Economics; Political Science; Economics; Political science;
    Type
    thesis
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Extent
    36 leaves
    Collections
    • Program of Asian Studies
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Cover for Environmental Performance and Women’s Empowerment: Is the Participation of Women in Decision-Making Associated with Stronger Environmental Policies?

      Environmental Performance and Women’s Empowerment: Is the Participation of Women in Decision-Making Associated with Stronger Environmental Policies? 

      Lorenzen, Rebecca Jane (Georgetown University, 2019)
      A small but growing research literature has found positive correlations between the participation of women in political decision-making and the comprehensiveness of the environmental policies in a country. In this thesis, ...
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility