Show simple item record

Files in this item

First page of document
dc.creator
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T19:17:47Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T19:17:47Z
dc.date.created2009
dc.date.issued
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMemorandum Opinion and Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00050 (FISA Ct. 2009) (Hogan, J.)en-US
dc.identifier.govdoc[REDACTED]
dc.identifier.otherGID.C.00050
dc.identifier.uri
dc.identifier.uri
dc.description[MD] ### Holding, Findings, and Matters of Law [Almost entirely consistent language and redactions to GID.C.00051 ( https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/1052745 ), but with some slight differences] ### Description Holding that the targeting and minimization procedures used in this case are consistent with the requirements of 50 U.S.C. §§1881a(d)-(e) and with the Fourth Amendment, and granting authorization to use them. However, recognizing that continued NSA noncompliance problems “principally involve analysts improperly acquiring the communications of U.S. persons, suggesting that the CIA problem is “arguably more troubling because it reflects a profound misunderstanding of minimization procedures,” recognizing that the government’s practice (unbeknownst to the Court) had been to report only certain noncompliance incidents and not others (such as failure to de-task accounts even after NSA learned that the targets entered the U.S.), and noting that the government must report to the Court every compliance incident that relates to the operation of the targeting or minimization procedures.en-US
dc.format1 pdfen-US
dc.language.isoen_USen-US
dc.publisherUnited States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courten-US
dc.subjectUnited States. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courten
dc.titleMemorandum Opinion and Order, [REDACTED]en-US
dc.typeRecord (document)en-US
dc.description.altFirst page of documenten-US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record