Show simple item record

Files in this item

First page of document
dc.creator
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-09T19:22:42Z
dc.date.available2020-04-09T19:22:42Z
dc.date.created2019-10-31
dc.date.issued
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationIn re Search Warrant Issued June 13, 2019, 942 F.3d 159 (4th Cir. 2019)en_US
dc.identifier.govdoc19-1730
dc.identifier.uri
dc.description[MD] ###Holding, Findings, and Matters of Law The district court erred in denying the law firm's motion seeking to enjoin the government's use of a filter team comprised of federal agents and prosecutors to inspect privileged attorney-client materials that were seized from the firm during the execution of a search warrant issued by a magistrate judge because the use of the team was improper as the team's creation inappropriately assigned judicial functions to the executive branch, the team was approved in ex parte proceedings prior to the search and seizures, and the use of the team contravened foundational principles that protected attorney-client relationships; the magistrate judge (or an appointed special master)—rather than the team—had to perform the privilege review of the seized materials. ####View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2416962628490160299&q=942+F.3d+159+&hl=en&as_sdt=20000006en_US
dc.format1 PDFen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUnited States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuiten_US
dc.subjectUnited States. Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)en_US
dc.titleIn re Search Warrant Issued June 13, 2019en_US
dc.typeRecord (document)en_US
dc.description.altFirst page of documenten_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record