Impact of the District of Columbia Homeowner’s and Renter’s Credit on Household Mobility
Abstract
A difference-in-differences model is built using 2013 and 2016 ACS data for the District of Columbia in order to measure if the expansion of Schedule H decreased the probability that a household moved in the past year. The model was tested using no controls, limited controls, and a full slate of control variables. The most robust model showed that the Schedule H expansion, controlling for the variables in the model, was associated with a 5.1 percentage point reduction of the probability of a household eligible for Schedule H moving in the past year when compared to households that were not eligible for Schedule H, calculated using the average of the effect across all observations.
Description
M.P.P.
Permanent Link
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1059594Date Published
2020Subject
Type
Publisher
Georgetown University
Extent
58 leaves
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
General Credit, Inc. v. Universal Credit Co.
United States. Court of Appeals (District of Columbia Circuit) (1937)