Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • McCourt School of Public Policy
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Public Policy
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • McCourt School of Public Policy
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Public Policy
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effects of Voter Registration Purging in Georgia During the 2018 U.S. Midterm Elections

    Cover for Effects of Voter Registration Purging in Georgia During the 2018 U.S. Midterm Elections
    View/Open
    View/Open: Sutton_georgetown_0076M_14558.pdf (1.1MB) Bookview

    Creator
    Sutton, Bailey
    Advisor
    Bednarzik, Robert
    ORCID
    0000-0002-6295-1843
    Abstract
    The Shelby County v. Holder Supreme Court decision struck down Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), which mandated Federal oversight of election administration for counties with histories of voter suppression. One result of this decision has been the increase of systematic removal of voter registration records, termed voter registration purging or voter purging by voting rights advocates. Despite the high stakes nature of elections, limited empirical research has been conducted to study the effects of this practice, especially when compared to other policies designed to limit voting. Therefore, this project looks at what influences the purge rate itself along with its effect on turnout and state election outcomes to determine the relationship between voter purging and voting policy metrics. The primary data set for analysis is the Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS) with supplemental data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the CQ Voting and Elections Collection. This study is confined to Georgia as the entire state was subject to Section 5 and has been accused of using voter registration purges as a tool to suppress voter turnout. The results of this project significantly contribute to the study of election policy by verifying a significant and negative relationship between the voter purge rate and turnout and between voter purge rate and the proportion of votes captured by the Republican senatorial candidate. While the first finding is important for voting rights activists, the second runs contrary to election goals of the Republican Party given their established record of encouraging more aggressive voter registration purging. Therefore, these results have significant policy implications for groups and demonstrate the need for more empirical analysis of the effects of voter purging.
    Description
    M.P.P.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1059615
    Date Published
    2020
    Subject
    elections; voter purging; voter registration; voting; Public policy; Public administration; Public policy; Public administration;
    Type
    thesis
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Extent
    79 leaves
    Collections
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Public Policy
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Cover for The highly charged rhetoric in trade politics : representations of China during the
      2010 U.S. midterm elections

      The highly charged rhetoric in trade politics : representations of China during the 2010 U.S. midterm elections 

      Cho, Helen H. (Georgetown University, 2011)
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility