Opinion and Order, In re Motion of ProPublica, Inc. for the Release of Ct. Recs.
Holding, Findings, and Matters of Law
The Court dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction.
Following the FISCR’s ruling in GID.CA.00013, 957 F.3d 1344, the Court held that “the FISC is not empowered by Congress to consider constitutional claims generally, First Amendment claims specifically, or freestanding motions filed by persons who are not authorized by FISA to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Id. at 3. Because the “reasons why the FISCR found it unwarranted to exercise ancillary jurisdiction over the ACLU motion apply to ProPublica’s, the FISC is foreclosed from doing so here.” Id.
Files in this item
Creator
Boasberg, James Emanuel, 1963-
Bibliographic Citation
Opinion and Order, In re Motion of ProPublica, Inc. for the Release of Ct. Recs., No. Misc. 13-09, GID.C.00284 (FISA Ct. Sept. 15, 2020) (Boasberg, J.)
Permanent Link
https://perma.cc/VQY3-G2DHhttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/1060399
Date
2020-09-15Type
Publisher
United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
Declassification Date
2020-09-16Identifier
GID.C.00284Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Opinion and Order, In re Motion for Publ’n of Recs.
Boasberg, James Emanuel, 1963- (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2020-09-15)