Opinion and Order, In re Motion of ProPublica, Inc. for the Release of Ct. Recs.
Files in this item
| dc.creator | Boasberg, James Emanuel, 1963- | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-17T19:02:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-09-17T19:02:08Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2020-09-15 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-09-16 | |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Opinion and Order, In re Motion of ProPublica, Inc. for the Release of Ct. Recs., No. Misc. 13-09, GID.C.00284 (FISA Ct. Sept. 15, 2020) (Boasberg, J.) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.govdoc | Misc. 13-09 | |
| dc.identifier.other | GID.C.00284 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://perma.cc/VQY3-G2DH | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1060399 | |
| dc.description | [MD] ### Holding, Findings, and Matters of Law The Court dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction. Following the FISCR’s ruling in GID.CA.00013, 957 F.3d 1344, the Court held that “the FISC is not empowered by Congress to consider constitutional claims generally, First Amendment claims specifically, or freestanding motions filed by persons who are not authorized by FISA to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Id. at 3. Because the “reasons why the FISCR found it unwarranted to exercise ancillary jurisdiction over the ACLU motion apply to ProPublica’s, the FISC is foreclosed from doing so here.” Id. | en_US |
| dc.format | 1 pdf | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | en_US |
| dc.subject | United States. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court | en_US |
| dc.title | Opinion and Order, In re Motion of ProPublica, Inc. for the Release of Ct. Recs. | en_US |
| dc.type | Record (document) | en_US |
| dc.description.alt | First page of document | en_US |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Opinion and Order, In re Motion for Publ’n of Recs.
(United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2020-09-15)
