Opinion and Order, In re Ops. & Ords. of this Ct. Containing Novel or Significant Interpretations of L.

Show simple item record

Files in this item

First page of document

Name:: gid_c_00285.pdf
Size:: 841kB
Format:: PDF

dc.creator	Boasberg, James Emanuel, 1963-
dc.date.accessioned	2020-09-17T19:06:31Z
dc.date.available	2020-09-17T19:06:31Z
dc.date.created	2020-09-15
dc.date.issued	2020-09-16
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation	Opinion and Order, In re Ops. & Ords. of this Ct. Containing Novel or Significant Interpretations of L., No. Misc. 16-01, GID.C.00285 (FISA Ct. Sept. 15, 2020) (Boasberg, J.)	en_US
dc.identifier.govdoc	Misc. 16-01
dc.identifier.other	GID.C.00285
dc.identifier.uri	https://perma.cc/DB99-GF44
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1060401
dc.description	[MD] ### Holding, Findings, and Matters of Law The Court dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction. Following the FISCR’s ruling in GID.CA.00013, 957 F.3d 1344, the Court held that “the FISC is not empowered by Congress to consider constitutional claims generally, First Amendment claims specifically, or freestanding motions filed by persons who are not authorized by FISA to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction.” Id. at 3. Because the “reasons why the FISCR found it unwarranted to exercise ancillary jurisdiction apply to the pending motion, the FISC is foreclosed from doing so here.” Id.	en_US
dc.format	1 pdf	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.publisher	United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court	en_US
dc.subject	United States. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court	en_US
dc.title	Opinion and Order, In re Ops. & Ords. of this Ct. Containing Novel or Significant Interpretations of L.	en_US
dc.type	Record (document)	en_US
dc.description.alt	First page of document	en_US

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record