United States v. Megahey
Holding, Findings, and Matters of Law
The Court denied the defendants’ motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA surveillance, finding that the “electronic surveillance was lawfully authorized and conducted.” 553 F. Supp. at 1200. The Court further found that employment of FISA did not violate Fifth Amendment due process rights or First Amendment rights of defendants. Id. at 1192-93, 94-95.
View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17251609258114403277&q=+553+F.+Supp.+1180&hl=en&as_sdt=20000006
Creator
Sifton, Charles
Bibliographic Citation
United States v. Megahey, 553 F. Supp. 1180 (E.D.N.Y. 1982).
Permanent Link
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1060497Date
1982-12-01Type
Publisher
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Declassification Date
1982-12-01Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Letter to Mark W. Bitensky, Life Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
DeLisi, Charles; United States. Department of Energy. Office of Energy Research. Office of Health and Environmental Research (1986-02-24)